Scrapfly
Strong anti-bot bypass behind a single flag (asp=true), markdown and AI output, and a per-response cost breakdown.
Where Scrapfly lands
Composite scores out of 10, from benchmark runs where every provider faces the identical task corpus. Rank is within that capability's field; the newest run backing this page is 2026-06-22. Full method: how we measure.
- Anti-bot bypass
- 100%
- Markdown clean
- 9.6 / 10
- Latency p50
- 4.5 s
- Cost
- $0.0025 / success
- Errors
- 0%
- Field accuracy
- 1.00
- Latency p50
- 4.5 s
- Cost
- $0.002 / useful
- Errors
- 0%
- Valid image
- 1.00
- Full-page
- 1.00
- Latency p50
- 12.0 s
- Cost
- $0.002 / call
- Errors
- 0%
- Task success
- 0.80
- Latency p50
- 17.4 s
- Cost
- $0.002 / call
- Errors
- 0%
The honest pitch
Pick it when anti-bot bypass that leads the benchmark, paired with the top measured AI-extraction accuracy, is the priority.
Not the pick if crawling or credit rollover matters; expect hard targets to cost around 30 credits per request.
About Scrapfly
Scrapfly centers on anti-bot bypass that benchmarks at the top of its class: a single flag enables an automated stealth system measured among the most effective against defenses from Cloudflare, DataDome and Akamai. Around it sit JavaScript rendering, extraction in both AI-powered and rule-based forms, and markdown output, with a transparent cost breakdown itemized on every response. On the hardest-to-reach targets, where the success rate is what counts, it performs at the top of the field.
Reaching it through NativePort
Identical paths, parameters and responses to Scrapfly's own documentation — the gateway holds the upstream credential and meters your balance at Scrapfly's real published usage price.
curl https://api.nativeport.ai/scrapfly/<native-path> \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $NATIVEPORT_API_KEY"