← All leaderboards
Rule-based extraction
What this board tests: structured fields pulled from a page via css/xpath rules. Every provider below ran the identical corpus on 2026-09-14. The composite blends measured quality, latency p50, the track-specific cost metric and error rate. Method and corpora: how we measure.
| Rank | Provider | Composite | Field accuracy | Cost | Latency p50 | Field note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  ScrapingBee |
9.2/10 | 1.00 | $0.00098 / useful | 3.0 s | Top-ranked rule-based extractor, at a fraction of AI-extract cost. |
| 2 |  Oxylabs |
8.38/10 | 1.00 | $0.0025 / useful | 12.1 s | |
| 3 |  ZenRows |
5.01/10 | 0.50 | $0.0028 / useful | 9.5 s | Every *.toscrape.com domain is blocklisted — an openly stated gap. |
Low scores are published alongside high ones — a ranking you can only trust if nothing gets hidden. No per-call markup, no commission from any provider. Cost figures are priced by the 2026-09-14 run's own table; the price the gateway bills today is on each provider page.